dr dee came first is the answer!!!!

you cant copywrong a fucking L-if-Estyle!!

whinge binge lol

I often struggle to find the distinction between showing affinity, kinship and sympathy for someone’s chosen cause and “parasitism”. Thus my avoidance of utilizing iconography and symbols originating from the intellectual domain of another. Too often we mistakenly feel we are sharing a path when we are only perceived as infringing upon it.

is it just me, or is this contradictory? and really, language is a shared thing, you coin a word, and then only you can use it, ? seriously? this is from a person who proposed a light house as a strategic place… or how about another house where it does not work because people most likely not meant to live up each others asses… and even when sharing a single home, like with NY State and what is now eastern region of the US had rather large homes and plenty of space… but our idea of private space, private language, ect… the idea of ownership is born with capitalism as it has manifest… this real abstraction… there is no historical reason to think that we will simply collapse over night (utterly and completely, power erodes, transforms, reinstates, please read about Sovereignty (I recommend Derrida’s lectures on the matter)… anyway, I doubt there will be much left of a pandrogeny project IF the regime collapses, as the physical part of the experiment (inspired by a character played by Gene Simons, as well as Platonic notions, AOS, and others, of a split beings (and its M-Other; Lacanian Psychoanalysis—- famous for There is No Big Other, and There is No Woman… this is not about biology, but it does do with the merely as in mirror)) and being inspired by these peoples is not a bad thing, where do ideas come from if not the “world” (that which is not one), our worlds worlding (because worlds do, see the work of Mereleu-Ponty (not to simply name drop, but to give sources and allow others to evaluate to be on a more common or equal footing in regards to sources of language data, the individual is alway social, and language unless it be (onesidely) schizophrenic, is also common (its POWER and CONTROL that have to step in and say something, use force sometimes to keep it)…. moving on to or past binary theories of biology (as well as self, selfhood, and the body, again the body in the way articulated by Mereleu-Ponty, as well as Luce Irigaray) Evolutions Rainbow [another work that rethink our binary notion of biology, which we have heard Genesis think about) —-we do not agree with this or that, but as a whole, we do not see anyone as our enemy (as such), they will continually reveal themselves when they slap the food from your hand as you try to feed your starving brother… that is the face of evil, and people become IT. Anyway, it seems a shame that we cannot carry on a dialog to move this forward to something more constructive like how to continue to build decentralized, leaderless (if that is desirable) communities that at once rethink communes (as if no one else has been a part of a communal experiment…) and how one will be best able to SURVIVE with the decay or dissemination of the current dominant social order as it is oft referred too… anyway… this is the most time we will put into this here…

OK…. now I’m just Confused…. Oh well will try to comprehend later. 23/657